TactiCoolGuy

Another one where I'm not mad, but just should be noted. Posted an item. He said he would take it. Meeting was arranged. Everything was gtg from comms to attitude( he is a good dude regardless) anyways. He saw the item and it was one of those ohhhhs you know isn't going to end well. He assumed it was a different variant of the item, and ended up not wanting it. Not really a big deal to me, but others here would certainly have held him to his word. Simply taking the ad for what it is could have avoided this mix up, but no worries and good luck finding the right one.

PM sent to TactiCoolGuy ... others not involved in this transaction are not invited to reply.

Exactly as stated. No bad blood here. However, Joe, check the link on your post. You do in fact have it linked as the BFH version not the regular LW (still as of 9:51 PM on 7/14). Since there is no other picture from the other side of the upper depicting the lack of the BFH marking then it does lead to believe the upper is a BFH.

Mod, whatever you decide, I'm good to go. Fault on both sides. We can carry on IMHO.

Both sides have responded.

Thread locked.