|
181 registered (blue1, 1morecast87, AIM_BUT_I_STILL_MISS, Davester, DoswellGuy, Diablo19x, Com 45acp, ENG032097, Apec, Drummer22995, Dre3k, Doughboy18718, Dlsims, Bluesplayer, Bigin28, Ayal, Duckdive, Cedarridge, Brother J, Ben_K, cadi86, Awonder, Apple a Day, Craaber, 59Rsp, AR_Zombie_Slayer, Donwon, 4harvick, cgool, chahn, akguy1150, Crypticalraisen, Eric Pugh, DamonL, dpl_hcm, BigLew703, Dale Schumacher, BSummers, Bound_For_Glory, 54 invisible),
320
Guests and
35
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
#2354800 - Today at 11:23 AM
One could argue that private sales w/o UBC is also moot by the restraining order
|
nvcdl
Sharp Shooter
Registered: 04/03/13
Posts: 2226
Loc: ORANGE
City or County: Orange
|
If you look at the language of the UBC law it ALSO bans the sale of so-called AWs.
Would seem to be that the Judges order should make the UBC moot - at the very least in regard to the sale of AWs.
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter7/section18.2-308.2:5/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index